Why So Many Rejected Paul: Reconsidering His Teachings Through a Torah Lens
Was Paul Really One of the Apostles?
Today, many believers accept Paul as a foundational apostle of the faith, with his letters making up nearly half of the New Testament. But a closer look at the first century reveals that the rejection of Paul was not limited to a few fringe voices. Instead, multiple groups—some of whom walked with Yeshua Himself—expressed serious concerns about Paul’s teachings, especially where they seemed to contradict the Torah.
If Paul were truly misunderstood, as many argue today, why was there such widespread dissent from those closest to the original disciples? And more importantly, should we continue accepting Paul’s teachings without scrutiny, especially when they appear to contradict the very commandments YHVH handed down?

I. The Ebionites: Torah-Keeping Followers Who Rejected Paul
- The Ebionites were one of the earliest Jewish-Christian sects. They:
- Considered James, the brother of Yeshua, their primary leader.
- Followed Torah strictly, including circumcision and dietary laws.
- Rejected Paul as an apostate.
According to early church father Epiphanius, the Ebionites believed Paul was not even a true Jew, but a Greek who converted for social gain and then turned against Torah (Epiphanius, Panarion 30.16.6–7).
II. The Pseudo-Clementines: Peter Versus Paul (as Simon Magus)
The Pseudo-Clementine Recognitions and Homilies, written in the second century, present Peter debating an adversary named Simon Magus. But many scholars believe Simon Magus is a literary stand-in for Paul (Eisenman, 1997):
- Simon teaches against the Law.
- He claims visions and private revelations.
- He is accused by Peter of corrupting Yeshua’s teachings.
In a “Letter of Peter to James” included in these writings, Peter warns James about a man who claims to have had visions and twists Yeshua’s words. Though unnamed, the parallels to Paul are clear. These texts reflect a strong rejection of Paul by Torah-keeping Jewish Christians who preserved apostolic tradition.
III. The Essenes and Elcesaites: Law-Obsessed and Anti-Pauline
While the Essenes of Qumran are not directly tied to Paul in the Dead Sea Scrolls, their worldview clashed fundamentally with his teachings:
- They emphasized ritual purity, strict Sabbath observance, and full Torah obedience.
- They likely influenced later groups like the Elcesaites, who outright rejected Paul.
Epiphanius wrote that the Elcesaites, who shared Essene roots, denied Paul and all his letters (Epiphanius, Panarion 19.1–5). Like the Ebionites, they viewed Paul as a corrupter of YHVH’s eternal commandments.
IV. Revelation: A Veiled Critique of Paul?
Revelation 2:2 records a rebuke from Yeshua to the assembly at Ephesus:
“You have tested those who claim to be apostles and are not, and have found them false.”
Paul spent significant time in Ephesus. Some scholars suggest that this verse may reflect early disputes about Paul’s authority (Tabor, 2006). Revelation’s emphasis on “keeping the commandments of God” (Revelation 12:17; 14:12) stands in stark contrast to Paul’s arguments that believers are “not under the Law” (Romans 6:14).
V. The Didache: A Torah-Positive Early Church Manual That Ignores Paul
The Didache, dated to the late first or early second century, offers instructions on how to live a righteous life as a follower of Yeshua:
- Encourages fasting, prayer, and Torah-aligned ethics.
- Mentions apostles and prophets but never cites Paul.
This silence is significant. If Paul was the central authority he’s made out to be today, why would an early church manual omit him entirely (Draper, 1996)?
VI. Paul’s Own Words: A Spy-Like Confession?
In 1 Corinthians 9:20-22, Paul admits:
“To the Jews I became as a Jew… to those under the law, as under the law… to those without law, as without law… I have become all things to all men.”
This is often seen as missionary strategy, but others interpret it as evidence of duplicity. Was Paul adjusting his message to suit his audience? The Torah forbids mixing truth with deception. This behavior alarmed early Torah-faithful communities who saw it as inconsistent with YHVH’s unchanging standard (Deuteronomy 13:1–5).
VII. Marcion and the Church Fathers: Paul Taken Too Far?
In the second century, Marcion exalted Paul above all others, rejecting the Torah and the Hebrew God entirely. His canon included only ten Pauline epistles and a version of Luke. This heresy prompted early church fathers like:
- Tertullian
- Origen
- Irenaeus
…to go to great lengths to defend Paul. But their need to defend him so aggressively shows how widespread the rejection of Paul had become (Tertullian, Against Marcion, Book 1).
VIII. A Visual Timeline of Pauline Opposition
Timeline: Opposition to Paul in Early Christianity
Year (CE) Event
30 Yeshua’s crucifixion – Apostolic movement begins under James, Peter, and John
50 Paul’s ministry begins; tension arises with Jerusalem apostles
70 Destruction of the Temple – Rise of the Ebionites, who reject Paul as apostate
100 Didache circulates – Omits Paul entirely, promotes Torah-positive ethics
150 Pseudo-Clementines spread – Present Paul as “Simon Magus,” enemy of Peter
180 Irenaeus confirms Ebionites reject Paul and all his letters
200 Tertullian defends Paul’s teachings against Marcionite extremes
325 Council of Nicaea – Paul’s epistles affirmed in the New Testament canon
From Yeshua’s crucifixion to the Council of Nicaea, Paul’s teachings were scrutinized, challenged, and often rejected by Torah-honoring believers.
IX. Why Does This Matter Today?
If so many in Paul’s own time — including those who knew Yeshua personally — challenged or rejected him, shouldn’t we at least examine his words for ourselves? Many today try to harmonize Paul with Torah, claiming:
“He didn’t really mean the Law is abolished.”
“He just taught a deeper spiritual application.”
“It’s all been misunderstood.”
But we are commanded to test a prophet or teacher against the commandments of YHVH (Deuteronomy 13:1–5).
We must ask: Do Paul’s teachings align with the Torah and the Ten Words? Or are we force-fitting them into our beliefs because they are convenient or popular?
X. Conclusion: Torah Is the Standard
Our loyalty should be to YHVH and His eternal Word, not to any man. The Torah tells us not to add to or take away from it (Deut. 4:2). Yeshua said He did not come to abolish the Law (Matthew 5:17-19).
If Paul’s writings align with Torah, we can affirm them. If they contradict the Torah or the words of Yeshua, we must reconsider their place in our doctrine.
The rejection of Paul by early Torah-keeping believers is not just an ancient controversy—it is a call to discernment for us today. Let us return to the foundation, test every teaching, and walk faithfully in YHVH’s commands.
References (APA Style)
Draper, J. A. (1996). The Didache in Modern Research. Brill.
Epiphanius of Salamis. (1987). The Panarion of Epiphanius of Salamis, Book I (Sects 1–46) (F. Williams, Trans.). Brill.
Eisenman, R. (1997). James the Brother of Jesus. Penguin Books.
Tabor, J. D. (2006). The Jesus Dynasty. Simon & Schuster.
Tertullian. (1885). Against Marcion. In A. Roberts & J. Donaldson (Eds.), Ante-Nicene Fathers (Vol. 3). Christian Literature Publishing Co.
If you liked this article, please consider these also:
The Slippery Slope…and Other Fallacies(Opens in a new browser tab)
Addressing the Accusations: When Pastors Attack(Opens in a new browser tab)
Yeshua: Not Abolishing the Law but Magnifying It(Opens in a new browser tab)
Foot Washing and Humility: Yeshua’s Example(Opens in a new browser tab)
Sabbath Loving Ants: A Kitchen Mystery Unfolds(Opens in a new browser tab)